As you'll note in the post above from Reventure App CEO Nick Gerli, there have only been five instances in the last 155 years where we've observed a year-over-year decline of at least 2% in U.S. M2 money supply: 1878, 1893, 1921, 1931-1933, and 2023.

Even though Gerli's post is now more than two years old, it demonstrates the strong correlation between declines in M2 money supply and trouble for the U.S. economy and Wall Street. Each of the previous four instances where M2 money supply notably dropped coincide with periods of economic depression and double-digit unemployment for the U.S. economy.

The caveat to this correlation is that a lot has changed from the four previous occurrences to the present day. For instance, the Federal Reserve didn't exist in 1878 or 1893. What's more, monetary and fiscal policy have evolved in a big way since the 1920s and 1930s. The likelihood of a depression taking shape in modern times, with a double-digit unemployment rate, is extremely low.

Nevertheless, a first-in-90-years decline in M2 money supply heightened the possibility of a near-term U.S. recession.

But as noted, there are two sides to this coin.

Just days ago, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System reported that the U.S. M2 money supply hit an all-time record high of $21.863 trillion in April 2025. The entirety of the 4.76% peak-to-trough drop between April 2022 and October 2023 has been erased.

A steadily climbing money supply is typically something observed when the U.S. economy is firing on all cylinders. A growing economy needs more capital in circulation to facilitate transactions and cover modest inflation. A record high for M2 would appear to bode well for the U.S. economy in the near term.

Additionally, M2 money supply increased at its fastest pace since 1870 during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic (more than 26% on a year-over-year basis). It's possible that the 4.76% decline observed from April 2022 to October 2023 represents nothing more than a benign reversion to the mean after a historic jump in available capital.

This whipsaw effect in M2 over the last three years, which is something not witnessed since the mid-1930s, suggests stocks may be extra volatile in the quarters and years to come.

Patience portends profits on Wall Street

Although the past couple of months have been extra volatile for the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500, and Nasdaq Composite, and recent shifts in M2 suggest this volatility may continue, there's no reason for patient investors to be alarmed. Time has a way of handsomely rewarding those with a long-term mindset.

For example, Gerli's data set speaks to a strong correlation between notable declines in the M2 money supply and weakness in the U.S. economy. Though downturns in the economy can be worrisome from the perspective of wage and job growth, they're most importantly short-lived.

Since World War II ended in September 1945, no U.S. recession has lasted longer than 18 months, and the average economic contraction has endured for just 10 months. In comparison, the average period of growth during this same time frame is about five years. The U.S. economy spends a disproportionate amount of time growing, and that's generally a good thing for corporate earnings.

This same nonlinearity can also be observed in stock market cycles. According to Bespoke Investment Group, the average S&P 500 bear market has lasted just 286 calendar days since the start of the Great Depression (September 1929). Comparatively, the typical S&P 500 bull market has endured 1,011 calendar days over the same span (through June 2023).

What's more, patience has, thus far, an immaculate track record of forecasting the future.

Every year, the analysts at Crestmont Research update their data set that examines the rolling 20-year total returns, including dividends paid, of the S&P 500 from the beginning of the 20th century onward. Even though the S&P didn't officially exist until 1923, researchers were able to track the total return of its components in other major indexes from 1900 to 1923.

Altogether, Crestmont Research has examined 106 rolling 20-year periods of total return data (1900-1919, 1901-1920, and so on, to 2005-2024). All 106 periods would have produced a positive annualized rate of return.

In other words, if an investor had hypothetically purchased an S&P 500 tracking index at any point from 1900 to 2005 and simply held their position for 20 years, they would have grown their wealth every time. Regardless of whether they held through a depression or recession, a pandemic, or purchased at a market top, they always came out ahead if they simply maintained perspective and demonstrated patience.

Should you invest $1,000 in S&P 500 Index right now?

Before you buy stock in S&P 500 Index, consider this:

The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and S&P 500 Index wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.

Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $651,049 !* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $828,224 !*

Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor ’s total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor .

See the 10 stocks »

*Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025

Sean Williams has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy .

U.S. Money Supply Is Making History on Both Ends -- Including a First Since the Great Depression -- and It Portends a Wild Ride for Stocks was originally published by The Motley Fool